Multi-decadal improvements in the ecological quality of European rivers are not consistently reflected in biodiversity metrics
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020699%3A_____%2F24%3AN0000028" target="_blank" >RIV/00020699:_____/24:N0000028 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02305-4" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-02305-4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02305-4" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41559-023-02305-4</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Multi-decadal improvements in the ecological quality of European rivers are not consistently reflected in biodiversity metrics
Original language description
Humans impact terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecosystems, yet many broad-scale studies have found no systematic, negative biodiversity changes (for example, decreasing abundance or taxon richness). Here we show that mixed biodiversity responses may arise because community metrics show variable responses to anthropogenic impacts across broad spatial scales. We first quantified temporal trends in anthropogenic impacts for 1,365 riverine invertebrate communities from 23 European countries, based on similarity to least-impacted reference communities. Reference comparisons provide necessary, but often missing, baselines for evaluating whether communities are negatively impacted or have improved (less or more similar, respectively). We then determined whether changing impacts were consistently reflected in metrics of community abundance, taxon richness, evenness and composition. Invertebrate communities improved, that is, became more similar to reference conditions, from 1992 until the 2010s, after which improvements plateaued. Improvements were generally reflected by higher taxon richness, providing evidence that certain community metrics can broadly indicate anthropogenic impacts. However, richness responses were highly variable among sites, and we found no consistent responses in community abundance, evenness or composition. These findings suggest that, without sufficient data and careful metric selection, many common community metrics cannot reliably reflect anthropogenic impacts, helping explain the prevalence of mixed biodiversity trends.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10617 - Marine biology, freshwater biology, limnology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Nature Ecology & Evolution
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
2397-334X
Volume of the periodical
—
Issue of the periodical within the volume
8
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
12
Pages from-to
430-441
UT code for WoS article
001271363400001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85183181593