All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Biomass allocation and carbon stock in Douglas fir and Norway spruce at the tree and stand level

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020702%3A_____%2F22%3AN0000020" target="_blank" >RIV/00020702:_____/22:N0000020 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/forj-2022-0005" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/forj-2022-0005</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/forj-2022-0005" target="_blank" >10.2478/forj-2022-0005</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Biomass allocation and carbon stock in Douglas fir and Norway spruce at the tree and stand level

  • Original language description

    The effect of changing tree species composition in favor of a greater representation of Douglas fir at the expense of Norway spruce on the carbon pool of Central European forests has not yet been investigated. Here, we compare the allocation of aboveground biomass and carbon stock in Douglas fir and spruce at the tree and stand level. At the tree level, Douglas fir accumulated, on average, 16.9% more aboveground biomass than Norway spruce. A greater amount of biomass was allocated mainly in the wood and bark of Douglas fir stem. For these biomass compartments, the difference between Douglas fir and Norway spruce was 21.1% and 60.3%, respectively. Spruce allocated more biomass in the crown, where the difference was 25.6% compared to Douglas fir. In needle biomass, Norway spruce exceeded Douglas fir by 84%. At the stand level, the analysis of model stands revealed that pure Norway spruce stands accumulated more carbon in the high and medium quality sites. As the site quality decreased, so did the differences in the amount of stored carbon. The higher carbon sink in Norway spruce stands was also confirmed in the analysis of real Norway spruce and Douglas fir stands. The difference in the carbon stock of young, medium-aged, and mature stands was 11.5%, 14.8%, and 1%, respectively. The positive balance in favor of spruce is mainly due to significantly higher numbers of trees per ha in Norway spruce stands. A positive effect of a greater representation of Douglas fir on the carbon budget of forest stands was not confirmed

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    40102 - Forestry

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/QJ1520299" target="_blank" >QJ1520299: Applying Douglas fir in forest management of the Czech Republic</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Central European Forestry Journal

  • ISSN

    2454-034X

  • e-ISSN

    2454-0358

  • Volume of the periodical

    68

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    SK - SLOVAKIA

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    163-173

  • UT code for WoS article

    000843699600004

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85138212763