Biomass allocation and carbon stock in Douglas fir and Norway spruce at the tree and stand level
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020702%3A_____%2F22%3AN0000020" target="_blank" >RIV/00020702:_____/22:N0000020 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/forj-2022-0005" target="_blank" >https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/forj-2022-0005</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/forj-2022-0005" target="_blank" >10.2478/forj-2022-0005</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Biomass allocation and carbon stock in Douglas fir and Norway spruce at the tree and stand level
Original language description
The effect of changing tree species composition in favor of a greater representation of Douglas fir at the expense of Norway spruce on the carbon pool of Central European forests has not yet been investigated. Here, we compare the allocation of aboveground biomass and carbon stock in Douglas fir and spruce at the tree and stand level. At the tree level, Douglas fir accumulated, on average, 16.9% more aboveground biomass than Norway spruce. A greater amount of biomass was allocated mainly in the wood and bark of Douglas fir stem. For these biomass compartments, the difference between Douglas fir and Norway spruce was 21.1% and 60.3%, respectively. Spruce allocated more biomass in the crown, where the difference was 25.6% compared to Douglas fir. In needle biomass, Norway spruce exceeded Douglas fir by 84%. At the stand level, the analysis of model stands revealed that pure Norway spruce stands accumulated more carbon in the high and medium quality sites. As the site quality decreased, so did the differences in the amount of stored carbon. The higher carbon sink in Norway spruce stands was also confirmed in the analysis of real Norway spruce and Douglas fir stands. The difference in the carbon stock of young, medium-aged, and mature stands was 11.5%, 14.8%, and 1%, respectively. The positive balance in favor of spruce is mainly due to significantly higher numbers of trees per ha in Norway spruce stands. A positive effect of a greater representation of Douglas fir on the carbon budget of forest stands was not confirmed
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
40102 - Forestry
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/QJ1520299" target="_blank" >QJ1520299: Applying Douglas fir in forest management of the Czech Republic</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Central European Forestry Journal
ISSN
2454-034X
e-ISSN
2454-0358
Volume of the periodical
68
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
SK - SLOVAKIA
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
163-173
UT code for WoS article
000843699600004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85138212763