All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Chronic Performance of a Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker 1-Year Follow-Up of the LEADLESS Trial

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F15%3A00059347" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/15:00059347 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0735109715006099/1-s2.0-S0735109715006099-main.pdf?_tid=4372355a-2630-11e5-976e-00000aab0f01&acdnat=1436442623_d5038c29bfe532b587311e4d102800df" target="_blank" >http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0735109715006099/1-s2.0-S0735109715006099-main.pdf?_tid=4372355a-2630-11e5-976e-00000aab0f01&acdnat=1436442623_d5038c29bfe532b587311e4d102800df</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.022" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.022</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Chronic Performance of a Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker 1-Year Follow-Up of the LEADLESS Trial

  • Original language description

    BACKGROUND A leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP) system was recently introduced to overcome lead-related complications of conventional pacing systems. To date, long-term results of an LCP system are unknown. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the complication incidence, electrical performance, and rate response characteristics within the first year of follow-up of patients implanted with an LCP. METHODS We retrospectively assessed intermediate-term follow-up data for 31 of 33 patients from the LEADLESS trial cohort who had an indication for single-chamber pacing and received an LCP between December 2012 and April 2013. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 76 +/- 8 years, and 65% were male. Between 3 and 12 months of follow-up, there were no pacemaker-related adverse events reported. The pacing performance results at 6- and 12-month follow-up were, respectively, as follows: mean pacing threshold (at a 0.4-ms pulse width), 0.40 +/- 0.26 V and 0.43 +/- 0.30 V; R-wave amplitude 10.6 +/- 2.6 mV and 10.3 +/- 2.2 mV; and impedance 625 +/- 205 Omega and 627 +/- 209 Omega. At the 12-month follow-up in 61% of the patients (n = 19 of 31), the rate response sensor was activated, and an adequate rate response was observed in all patients. CONCLUSIONS The LCP demonstrates very stable performance and reassuring safety results during intermediate-term follow-up. These results support the use of the LCP as a promising alternative to conventional pacemaker systems. Continued evaluation is warranted to further characterize this system. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2015

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology

  • ISSN

    0735-1097

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    65

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    15

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    8

  • Pages from-to

    1497-1504

  • UT code for WoS article

    000352956500001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84928024666