Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia as the first-line therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular systolic function: long-term results
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F15%3A00059546" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/15:00059546 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.12751/epdf" target="_blank" >http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.12751/epdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.12751" target="_blank" >10.1111/jce.12751</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia as the first-line therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular systolic function: long-term results
Original language description
VT Ablation in Patients With Preserved LV Function IntroductionPatients with coronary artery disease (CAD), relatively preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and hemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia (VT) may benefit from catheter ablation as the first-line treatment. Our aim was to analyze the long-term results of VT ablation in this population. Methods and ResultsThirty-one patients (1 woman, mean age 67 10 years) with CAD, tolerated VT, and LVEF 40% underwent catheter ablation as the first-line treatment of the arrhythmia. Catheter ablation was performed in order to abolish all inducible VTs. An ICD was implanted if sustained VT of any morphology remained inducible after the procedure. The mean LVEF was 48 +/- 6% and the mean VT cycle length reached 348 +/- 70 milliseconds in the study cohort. Clinical and all inducible VTs were abolished in 90% (28/31) and 58% (18/31) of the patients, respectively. An ICD was subsequently implanted in 42% of cases. Over a mean follow-up of 3.8 +/- 2.9 years, 42% (13/31) patients died. Survival of the patients with or without the ICD was not significantly different (P = 0.47). VT recurrence was observed in 11% (2/18) of patients who had complete elimination of all inducible VTs. No sudden death occurred in patients without the ICD. ConclusionsCatheter ablation of VT as the first-line treatment in patients with CAD and relatively preserved LVEF is a viable strategy. It may prevent implantation of the ICD in a considerable proportion of patients. Abolition of all inducible VTs confers low VT recurrence rate over a long-term follow-up.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FA - Cardiovascular diseases including cardio-surgery
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2015
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN
1045-3873
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
26
Issue of the periodical within the volume
10
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
6
Pages from-to
1105-1110
UT code for WoS article
000363211600016
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—