Solid organ transplantation-where we are and how far can we possibly go?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F16%3A00059993" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/16:00059993 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10353-016-0403-7" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10353-016-0403-7</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10353-016-0403-7" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10353-016-0403-7</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Solid organ transplantation-where we are and how far can we possibly go?
Original language description
Background Solid organ transplants, e. g., kidney, pancreas, and liver, are well-established transplant methods at the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Czech Republic. Looking at the waiting lists, results, and also population in detail, some patients still suffer. Methods For the described reasons we have introduced some novel transplant methods since the second half of 2011. Kidney patients stay on dialysis; few get the best treatment method, which is live-donor kidney transplantation. Therefore, the live-donor program has been reorganized, kidney paired donation program introduced, miniinvasive donor nephrectomy used in all cases. Some liver patients suffer as well, especially small adults and children, also fulminant liver failure cases and those with multivisceral thrombosis. For these groups of patients we have introduced split-liver transplantation, ABO incompatible (AB0i) liver transplantation, live-donor liver transplantation, auxiliary liver transplantation, and also small bowel/multivisceral transplantation. Results Thanks to the changes, the number of live-donor kidney transplants has increased, the number of liver transplants doubled, many fulminant liver patients survived thanks to AB0i and auxiliary transplantation, and pediatric liver cases waiting time dropped dramatically. The small bowel transplant program started successfully with two multivisceral cases. Conclusion The novel methods and some program changes led to more transplants and also better outcomes. There is still room for further expansion and developments; there are for sure more transplant methods to be introduced. Also, the number of some transplants, e.g., live-donor kidney, still remains low.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FJ - Surgery including transplantology
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
European surgery
ISSN
1682-8631
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
48
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Supplement 2
Country of publishing house
AT - AUSTRIA
Number of pages
5
Pages from-to
"S130"-"S134"
UT code for WoS article
000376594600005
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—