Standard work-up of the low-risk kidney transplant candidate: a European expert survey of the ERA-EDTA Developing Education Science and Care for Renal Transplantation in European States Working Group
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F19%3A00078529" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/19:00078529 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/34/9/1605/5281215" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/34/9/1605/5281215</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy391" target="_blank" >10.1093/ndt/gfy391</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Standard work-up of the low-risk kidney transplant candidate: a European expert survey of the ERA-EDTA Developing Education Science and Care for Renal Transplantation in European States Working Group
Original language description
Background. Existing guidelines on the evaluation and preparation of recipients for kidney transplantation target the entire spectrum of patients with end-stage renal disease. Within the ERA-EDTA Developing Education Science and Care for Renal Transplantation in European States (DESCARTES) Working Group, it was proposed that in a subset of relatively young patients (<40 years) without significant comorbidities (such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease), the work-up for transplantation could be restricted to a small set of tests. Methods. Aiming for agreement between transplant centres across Europe, we surveyed the opinion of 80 transplant professionals from 11 European states on the composition of a minimal work-up. Results. We show that there is a wide agreement among European experts that the work-up for kidney transplantation of the low-risk candidate, as opposed to the standard risk candidate, could include a limited number of investigations. However, there is some disagreement regarding the small number of diagnostic procedures, which is related to geographical location within Europe and the professional background of respondents. Conclusions. Based on the results of the survey, published guidelines and expert meetings by the DESCARTES Working Group, we have formulated a proposal for the work-up of lowrisk kidney transplant candidates.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30217 - Urology and nephrology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation
ISSN
0931-0509
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
34
Issue of the periodical within the volume
9
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
7
Pages from-to
1605-1611
UT code for WoS article
000493309000024
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85071609027