All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias: use the right tool for the right outcome, in the right population

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F20%3A00080524" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/20:00080524 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/8/1147/5857108" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/8/1147/5857108</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa065" target="_blank" >10.1093/europace/euaa065</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias: use the right tool for the right outcome, in the right population

  • Original language description

    In clinical practice and for scientific purposes, cardiologists and primary care physicians perform risk assessment in patients with cardiac diseases or conditions with high risk of developing such. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) set down this expert consensus statement task force to summarize the consensus regarding risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias. Objectives were to raise awareness of using the right risk assessment tool for a given outcome in a given population, and to provide physicians with practical proposals that may lead to rational and evidence-based risk assessment and improvement of patient care in this regard. A large variety of methods are used for risk assessment and choosing the best methods and tools hereof in a given situation is not simple. Even though parameters and test results found associated with increased risk of one outcome (e.g. death) may also be associated with higher risk of other adverse outcomes, specific risk assessment strategies should be used only for the purposes for which they are validated. The work of this task force is summarized in a row of consensus statement tables. © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Europace

  • ISSN

    1099-5129

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    22

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    8

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    48

  • Pages from-to

    1147-1148

  • UT code for WoS article

    000593968000002

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85089127351