Impact of centre volume on atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes in Europe: A report from the ESC EHRA EORP Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term (AFA LT) Registry
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F21%3A00080812" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/21:00080812 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/23/1/49/5952760" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/23/1/49/5952760</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa236" target="_blank" >10.1093/europace/euaa236</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Impact of centre volume on atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes in Europe: A report from the ESC EHRA EORP Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term (AFA LT) Registry
Original language description
Aims: The aim of the study was to investigate differences in clinical outcomes and complication rates among European atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation centres related to the volume of AF ablations performed. Methods and results: Data for this analysis were extracted from the ESC EHRA EORP European AF Ablation Long-Term Study Registry. Based on 33rd and 67th percentiles of number of AF ablations performed, the participating centres were classified into high volume (HV) (≥ 180 procedures/year), medium volume (MV) (<180 and ≥74/year), and low volume (LV) (<74/year). A total of 91 centres in 26 European countries enrolled in 3368 patients. There was a significantly higher reporting of cardiovascular complications and stroke incidence in LV centres compared with HV and MV (P = 0.039 and 0.008, respectively) and a lower success rate after AF ablation (55.3% in HV vs. 57.2% in LV vs. 67.4% in MV centres, P < 0.001), despite lower CHA2DS2-VASc score of patients, enrolled in LVs and less complex ablation techniques used. Adjustments of confounding factors (including type of AF ablation) led to elimination of these differences. Conclusion: Low-volume centres tended to present slightly higher cardiovascular complications' and stroke incidence and a lower unadjusted success rate after AF ablation, despite the fact that ablation procedures and patients were of lower risk compared with MV and HV centres. On the other hand, adjusted overall complication and recurrence rates were non-significantly different among different volume centres, a fact reflecting the heterogeneity of patient and procedural profiles, and a counterbalance between expertise and risk level among participating centres. © 2020 The Author(s).
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Europace
ISSN
1099-5129
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
23
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
49-58
UT code for WoS article
000637048100006
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85100702545