All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Significant differences in IBD care and education across Europe: results of the pan-European VIPER survey

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F23%3A00083981" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/23:00083981 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000890024900001" target="_blank" >https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000890024900001</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000528070" target="_blank" >10.1159/000528070</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Significant differences in IBD care and education across Europe: results of the pan-European VIPER survey

  • Original language description

    Background:Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care and education might differ around Europe. Therefore, we conducted this European Variation In IBD PracticE suRvey (VIPER) to investigate potential differences between countries.Methods:This trainee-initiated survey, run through SurveyMonkey (R), consisted of 47 questions inquiring basic demographics, IBD training, and clinical care. Results were compared according to gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, for which countries were divided into 2 groups (low/high income, according to the World Bank). Results:The online survey was completed by 1285 participants from 40 European countries, with a majority of specialists (65.3%) working in academic institutions (50.4%). Significant differences in IBD-specific training (55.9% vs. 38.4%), as well as availability of IBD units (58.4% vs. 39.7%) and multidisciplinary meetings (73.2% vs. 40.1%) were observed between respondees from high and low GDP countries (p&lt;0.0001). In high GDP countries, IBD nurses are more common (85.9% vs. 36.0%), also mirrored by more nurse-led IBD clinics (40.6% vs. 13.7%; p&lt;0.0001). IBD dieticians (33.4% vs. 16.5%) and psychologists (16.8% vs. 7.5%) are mainly present in high GDP countries (p&lt;0.0001). In the current COVID era, telemedicine is available in 73.2% vs. 54.1% of the high/low GDP countries respectively (p&lt;0.0001). Treat-to-target approaches are implemented everywhere (85.0%), though access to biologicals and small molecules differs significantly. Conclusion:Much variability in IBD practice exists across Europe, with marked differences between high vs. low GDP countries. Further work is required to help address some of these inequalities, aiming to improve and standardize IBD care and training across Europe.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30219 - Gastroenterology and hepatology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Digestive diseases

  • ISSN

    0257-2753

  • e-ISSN

    1421-9875

  • Volume of the periodical

    41

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    3

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    18

  • Pages from-to

    387-395

  • UT code for WoS article

    001061267100011

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85152674936