Pollination efficiency of cockroaches and other floral visitors of Clusia blattophila
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023272%3A_____%2F19%3A10134654" target="_blank" >RIV/00023272:_____/19:10134654 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11310/19:10400316
Result on the web
<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/plb.12956" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/plb.12956</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/plb.12956" target="_blank" >10.1111/plb.12956</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Pollination efficiency of cockroaches and other floral visitors of Clusia blattophila
Original language description
Cockroaches have rarely been documented as pollinators. In this paper we examine whether this is because they might be inefficient at pollination compared to other pollinators. Clusia blattophila, a dioecious shrub growing on isolated rocky outcrops in French Guiana, is pollinated by Amazonina platystylata cockroaches and provides a valuable system for the study of cockroach pollination efficiency. We examined the species composition of the visitor guild and visitation rates by means of camcorder recordings and visitor sampling. Then, we investigated the capacity for pollen transfer of principal visitors and found correlations between visitation rates and pollen loads on stigmas. In an exclusion experiment we determined the contributions of individual species to pollination success. Amazonina platystylata, crickets and two species of Diptera transferred pollen, but the number of transferred pollen grains was only related to visitation rates in the case of cockroaches. Crickets visited and rarely carried pollen. Dipterans were as frequent as cockroaches, carried similar pollen loads, but transferred much less pollen. An estimated 41% and 17% of ovules were pollinated by cockroaches and dipterans, respectively. The remaining ovules were not pollinated. There was no spatial variation in pollinator guild composition, but cockroaches visited flowers less frequently at the smaller study site. We demonstrate that cockroaches pollinate a large proportion of ovules. Their pollination service is not confined to one study site and, unlike that provided by dipterans, is not limited to certain years. We suggest that cockroach pollination has been overlooked and that cockroach-pollinated plants, which share certain floral features, possess adaptations to pollination by cockroaches.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10616 - Entomology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Plant Biology
ISSN
1435-8603
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
21
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
753-761
UT code for WoS article
000473626000022
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—