Development of quality indicators for mental healthcare in the danube region

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F18%3A43919422" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/18:43919422 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="http://www.hdbp.org/psychiatria_danubina/pdf/dnb_vol30_no2/dnb_vol30_no2_197.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.hdbp.org/psychiatria_danubina/pdf/dnb_vol30_no2/dnb_vol30_no2_197.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2018.197" target="_blank" >10.24869/psyd.2018.197</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Development of quality indicators for mental healthcare in the danube region

Original language description

Background: Quality indicators are quality assurance instruments for the evaluation of mental healthcare systems. Quality indicators can be used to measure the effectiveness of mental healthcare structure and process reforms. This project aims to develop quality indicators for mental healthcare systems in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Serbia to provide monitoring instruments for the transformation of mental healthcare systems in these countries. Methods: Quality indicators for mental healthcare systems were developed in a systematic, multidisciplinary approach. A systematic literature study was conducted to identify quality indicators that are used internationally in mental healthcare. Retrieved quality indicators were systematically selected by means of defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality indicators were subsequently rated in a two-stage Delphi study for relevance, validity and feasibility (data availability and data collection effort). The Delphi panel included 22 individuals in the first round, and 18 individuals in the second and final round. Results: Overall, mental healthcare quality indicators were rated higher in relevance than in validity (Mean relevance=7.6, SD=0.8; Mean validity=7.1, SD=0.7). There was no statistically significant difference in scores between the four countries for relevance (X2 (3)=3.581, p=0.310) and validity (X2 (3)=1.145, p=0.766). For data availability, the appraisal of “YES” (data are available) ranged from 6% for “assisted housing” to 94% for “total beds for mental healthcare per 100,000 population” and “availability of mental health service facilities”. Conclusion: Quality indicators were developed in a systematic and multidisciplinary development process. There was a broad consensus among mental healthcare experts from the participating countries in terms of relevance and validity of the proposed quality indicators. In a next step, the feasibility of these twenty-two indicators will be evaluated in a pilot study in the participating countries.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30215 - Psychiatry

Project

—

Continuities

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Publication year

2018

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Psychiatria Danubina

ISSN

0353-5053

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

30

Issue of the periodical within the volume

2

Country of publishing house

HR - CROATIA

Number of pages

10

Pages from-to

197-206

UT code for WoS article

000435654600011

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85048689633