Beck Depression Inventory-II: Self-report or interview-based administrations show different results in older persons

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F19%3A43919498" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/19:43919498 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics/article/beck-depression-inventoryii-selfreport-or-interviewbased-administrations-show-different-results-in-older-persons/DBA93C0B7E8FCC4BCBB7D38A0FE79B1A" target="_blank" >https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-psychogeriatrics/article/beck-depression-inventoryii-selfreport-or-interviewbased-administrations-show-different-results-in-older-persons/DBA93C0B7E8FCC4BCBB7D38A0FE79B1A</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1041610218001187" target="_blank" >10.1017/S1041610218001187</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Beck Depression Inventory-II: Self-report or interview-based administrations show different results in older persons
Original language description
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is one of the most-used rating scales. It was developed as a tool administered either as a self-rating or interview-based, observer-rating scale. Objective: The goal of this study is to compare BDI-II scores obtained with two standard methods of administration in community-based older persons. Methods: BDI-II was administered at first in the self-rated version to a sample of 60 mentally healthy older persons (age 60–87 years). Afterward, the interview-based administration was performed. Analyses: We compared the scores with nonparametric tests — Spearman’s correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. We also computed internal consistency. Results: Self-rated BDI-II yielded significantly higher total score than interview (p < 0.001, P = 88%). The correlation between total scores was moderate (rs = 0.46, p < 0.001). Item analysis revealed a larger decrease (lower scores) in the somatic items in the interview-based version. Conclusions: The two methods of administration result in different total score in healthy older persons. Therefore, interpretation of the scores should reflect the administration, which should be always specified in the studies.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
50102 - Psychology, special (including therapy for learning, speech, hearing, visual and other physical and mental disabilities);

Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)