Repeat Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Progressive or Recurrent Vestibular Schwannomas
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023884%3A_____%2F19%3A00008379" target="_blank" >RIV/00023884:_____/19:00008379 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/issue/85/4" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/issue/85/4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy416" target="_blank" >10.1093/neuros/nyy416</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Repeat Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Progressive or Recurrent Vestibular Schwannomas
Original language description
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a highly effective management approach for patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS), with 10-yr control rates up 98%. When it fails, however, few data are available to guide management. OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent 2 SRS procedures on the same VS to assess the safety and efficacy of this practice. METHODS: This study was opened to centers of the International Gamma Knife Research Foundation (IGKRF). Data collected included patient characteristics, clinical symptoms at the time of SRS, radiosurgery dosimetric data, imaging response, clinical evolution, and survival. Actuarial analyses of tumor responses were performed. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients from 8 IGKRF centers were identified. Median follow-up from the second SRS was 51.7 mo. Progression after the first SRS occurred at a median of 43 mo. Repeat SRS was performed using a median dose of 12 Gy. Actuarial tumor control rates at 2, 5, and 10 yr following the second SRS were 98.6%, 92.2%, and 92.2%, respectively. Useful hearing was present in 30%, 8%, and 5% of patients at first SRS, second SRS, and last follow-up, respectively. Seventy-five percent of patients reported stable or improved symptoms following the second SRS. Worsening of facial nerve function attributable to SRS occurred in 7% of cases. There were no reports of radionecrosis, radiation-associated edema requiring corticosteroids, radiation-related neoplasia, or death attributable to the repeat SRS procedure. CONCLUSION: Patients with progressing VS after radiosurgery can be safely and effectively managed using a second SRS procedure.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Neurosurgery
ISSN
0148-396X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
85
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
535-542
UT code for WoS article
000491255600012
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85063350412