All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Correcting geocenter motion in GNSS solutions by combining with satellite laser ranging data

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00025615%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000016" target="_blank" >RIV/00025615:_____/25:N0000016 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10291-025-01920-x" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10291-025-01920-x</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10291-025-01920-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10291-025-01920-x</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Correcting geocenter motion in GNSS solutions by combining with satellite laser ranging data

  • Original language description

    Geocenter motion in GNSS solutions is ill-defined because of the GNSS orbit modeling errors. Especially, the Z geocenter component derived from GNSS data is mostly affected, as that includes strong draconitic signals. In GNSS processing, we lack direct access to Earth's actual center of mass, even though orbital dynamics fundamentally depend on it. Instead, satellites are computed to orbit around a theoretical point that has no geophysical interpretation, called the apparent center of mass. We derive a method of enhancing GNSS processing by incorporating the correct geocenter motion information by combining GNSS microwave-based observations with Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) observations to Galileo and GLONASS, as well as SLR observations to two LAGEOS satellites. We found that SLR observations to GNSS cannot improve the geocenter variations alone because GNSS solutions are still affected by spurious draconitic signals. Oppositely, SLR observations to LAGEOS almost eliminate the draconitic signal in the Z geocenter component and guarantee that the geocenter motion is properly handled in the GNSS processing. To achieve this, adding range observations to LAGEOS is sufficient, even without considering SLR observations to GNSS satellites, thus, even without the proper SLR-GNSS co-location in space onboard GNSS satellites. We also found that different handling of range biases in SLR data to GNSS may change the mean geocenter offset, however, it does not have any impact on the geocenter temporal variations and reduction of the draconite signals.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    GPS Solutions

  • ISSN

    1080-5370

  • e-ISSN

    1521-1886

  • Volume of the periodical

    29

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    4

  • Country of publishing house

    DE - GERMANY

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    001522734600001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-105009957586