Crustal melting vs. fractionation of basaltic magmas: Part 1, Granites and paradigms

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00025798%3A_____%2F21%3A00000105" target="_blank" >RIV/00025798:_____/21:00000105 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00216208:11310/21:10436579

Result on the web

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106291" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106291</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106291" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106291</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Crustal melting vs. fractionation of basaltic magmas: Part 1, Granites and paradigms

Original language description

Granitoids are a major component of the continental crust. They play a pivotal role in its evolution, either by adding new material (continental growth), or by reworking older continental crust. These two roles correspond to two main ways of forming granitic magmas, either by partial melting of pre-existing crustal rocks yielding granitic melts directly, or by fractionation of mantle-derived mafic to intermediate magmas. Both models represent endmembers, or paradigms that have shaped the way the geological community envisions granitoids, their occurrence, features, formation and meaning for crustal evolution and differentiation of the whole planet.In this paper, we expose the two competing paradigms and their implications. We explore the evidence on which each model is based, and how each school of thought articulates a comprehensive view of granitic magmatism based on field geological, petrological, geochemical (including isotopes) and physical constraints; and how, in turn, each view shapes the thinking on crustal growth and evolution, and the interpretation of proxies such as age and Hf isotopic patterns in detrital zircon databases. We emphasize that both schools of thought build a different, but internally consistent view based on a large body of evidence, and we propose that each of them is or has been relevant to some portions of the Earth. Thus, the key question is not so much 'which' model applies, but 'where, when and to which extent'.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

10505 - Geology

Project

<a href="/en/project/GA18-24378S" target="_blank" >GA18-24378S: Petrogenesis of (ultra-)potassic magmas in the European Variscides – implications for development of collisional orogens and crustal growth models</a><br>

Continuities

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year

2021

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Lithos

ISSN

0024-4937

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

402-403

Issue of the periodical within the volume

November : 106291

Country of publishing house

NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

Number of pages

17

Pages from-to

nestránkováno

UT code for WoS article

000713001800009

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85109087584