All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Trapping of internal and external feeding stored grain beetle pests with two types of pitfall traps: a two-year field study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027006%3A_____%2F16%3A00003383" target="_blank" >RIV/00027006:_____/16:00003383 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/30/2015-PPS" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/30/2015-PPS</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/30/2015-PPS" target="_blank" >10.17221/30/2015-PPS</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Trapping of internal and external feeding stored grain beetle pests with two types of pitfall traps: a two-year field study

  • Original language description

    Pitfall trapping studies are available for particular stored grain pest species. In small farms, the stored grain pest control strategy is rarely species-specific but is often “pest ecological-group-specific” instead. A two-year field study was conducted in flat grain stores to compare the efficacy of cone-surface (PC trap; AgriSense-BCS Ltd., Pontypridd, UK) and probe-subsurface (WB Probe II Trap; Trécé Inc., Adair, USA) traps for three ecological insect pest groups (Group I, internal feeding primary pests; Group II, external feeding primary pests; Group III, external feeding secondary pests). Altogether, 1328 specimens (32% Group I, 11% Group II, and 57% Group III) in 12 species of Coleoptera (17% Group I, 25% Group II, and 58% Group III) were trapped. No significant differences were found in the efficacy of PC traps and WB Probe II Traps to catch the evaluated ecological pest groups over the long term. Our study indicated that for trends to appear in long-term trapping there was no need for the simultaneous use of both traps due to the low trapping differences between the surface and subsurface types of traps in all ecological pest groups. However, significant differences between the traps were found in the short-term evaluations and before and after fumigation; in that case, the use of both traps is recommended because of the higher sensitivity and more precise evaluation of efficacy of the control treatment effects.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    GF - Diseases, pests, weeds and plant protection

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Plant Protection Science

  • ISSN

    1212-2580

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    52

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    45-53

  • UT code for WoS article

    000372120200006

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database