Trapping of internal and external feeding stored grain beetle pests with two types of pitfall traps: a two-year field study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027006%3A_____%2F16%3A00003383" target="_blank" >RIV/00027006:_____/16:00003383 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/30/2015-PPS" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/30/2015-PPS</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/30/2015-PPS" target="_blank" >10.17221/30/2015-PPS</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Trapping of internal and external feeding stored grain beetle pests with two types of pitfall traps: a two-year field study
Original language description
Pitfall trapping studies are available for particular stored grain pest species. In small farms, the stored grain pest control strategy is rarely species-specific but is often “pest ecological-group-specific” instead. A two-year field study was conducted in flat grain stores to compare the efficacy of cone-surface (PC trap; AgriSense-BCS Ltd., Pontypridd, UK) and probe-subsurface (WB Probe II Trap; Trécé Inc., Adair, USA) traps for three ecological insect pest groups (Group I, internal feeding primary pests; Group II, external feeding primary pests; Group III, external feeding secondary pests). Altogether, 1328 specimens (32% Group I, 11% Group II, and 57% Group III) in 12 species of Coleoptera (17% Group I, 25% Group II, and 58% Group III) were trapped. No significant differences were found in the efficacy of PC traps and WB Probe II Traps to catch the evaluated ecological pest groups over the long term. Our study indicated that for trends to appear in long-term trapping there was no need for the simultaneous use of both traps due to the low trapping differences between the surface and subsurface types of traps in all ecological pest groups. However, significant differences between the traps were found in the short-term evaluations and before and after fumigation; in that case, the use of both traps is recommended because of the higher sensitivity and more precise evaluation of efficacy of the control treatment effects.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
GF - Diseases, pests, weeds and plant protection
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Plant Protection Science
ISSN
1212-2580
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
52
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
9
Pages from-to
45-53
UT code for WoS article
000372120200006
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—