A systematic conservation strategy for crop wild relatives in the Czech Republic
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027006%3A_____%2F17%3A00004013" target="_blank" >RIV/00027006:_____/17:00004013 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12539" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12539</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12539" target="_blank" >10.1111/ddi.12539</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
A systematic conservation strategy for crop wild relatives in the Czech Republic
Original language description
Aim was to create a crop wild relative (CWR) conservation strategy for the Czech Republic: the first national CWR conservation strategy for Central and Eastern Europe. Methods: We generated a CWR checklist for the Czech Republic and then prioritized taxa, using widely adopted criteria modified with input from local experts, to create a national CWR inventory. For 204 priority CWR species, we collated 206,760 presence records. We carried out spatial analyses to identify patterns in species richness, gaps in existing conservation actions, complementary conservation networks and collecting strategies to increase representativeness of gene bank accessions. We considered both specific and genetic conservation, using geographic and ecogeographic proxies for the latter. Results: Passive in situ conservation of CWR in the Czech Republic is comprehensive at present, with all but one priority CWR species being contained in protected areas. Active in situ CWR conservation could be focussed within 11 ca. 10-km-by-10-km grid cells containing 94% of priority species, or their overlapping protected areas. To augment the genetic coverage of the in situ conservation network, active CWR conservation is encouraged within 11 supplementary areas. Meanwhile, there are huge gaps in ex situ collections, with no known conserved material for 134 of the 204 priority species. Furthermore, existing accessions are generally unrepresentative of genetic diversity. Main conclusions: In the Czech Republic, active in situ conservation of priority CWR should be instigated within the 22 recommended grid cell areas or their 14 overlapping protected areas. For ex situ conservation, strategic and targeted collection of germplasm would markedly increase the value of gene bank collections. Diversity of priority Czech CWR is concentrated in South Moravia, making this a particularly important CWR area for the country and for Europe.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
10619 - Biodiversity conservation
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/DF11P01OVV006" target="_blank" >DF11P01OVV006: Rescue and conservation of cultural heritage of historical Czech and Moravian fruit land races and other traditional and underutilized crops</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2017
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Diversity and Distributions
ISSN
1472-4642
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
23
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
15
Pages from-to
448-462
UT code for WoS article
000396040700009
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—