All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Consequences of spatial structure in soil-geomorphic data on the results of machine learning models

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027073%3A_____%2F23%3AN0000016" target="_blank" >RIV/00027073:_____/23:N0000016 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/62156489:43410/23:43923822

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10106049.2023.2245381" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10106049.2023.2245381</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2023.2245381" target="_blank" >10.1080/10106049.2023.2245381</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Consequences of spatial structure in soil-geomorphic data on the results of machine learning models

  • Original language description

    In this paper, we examined the degree to which inherent spatial structure in soil properties influences the outcomes of machine learning (ML) approaches to predicting soil spatial variability. We compared the performances of four ML algorithms (support vector machine, artificial neural network, random forest, and random forest for spatial data) against two non-ML algorithms (ordinary least squares regression and spatial filtering regression). None of the ML algorithms produced residuals that had lower mean values or were less autocorrelated over space compared with the non-ML approaches. We recommend the use of random forest when a soil variable of interest is weakly autocorrelated (Moran's I < 0.1) and spatial filtering regression when it is relatively strongly autocorrelated (Moran's I > 0.4). Overall, this work opens the door to a more consistent selection of model algorithms through the establishment of threshold criteria for spatial autocorrelation of input variables.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/SS02030018" target="_blank" >SS02030018: Center for Landscape and Biodiversity</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Geocarto International

  • ISSN

    1010-6049

  • e-ISSN

    1752-0762

  • Volume of the periodical

    38

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    15

  • Pages from-to

    2245381

  • UT code for WoS article

    001048405500001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85168159365