All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Environmental impact on differential composition of gut microbiota in indoor chickens in commercial production and outdoor, backyard chickens

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027162%3A_____%2F20%3AN0000029" target="_blank" >RIV/00027162:_____/20:N0000029 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/5/767" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/5/767</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8050767" target="_blank" >10.3390/microorganisms8050767</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Environmental impact on differential composition of gut microbiota in indoor chickens in commercial production and outdoor, backyard chickens

  • Original language description

    In this study, we compared the caecal microbiota composition of egg-laying hens from commercial production that are kept indoors throughout their whole life with microbiota of hens kept outdoors. The microbiota of outdoor hens consisted of lower numbers of bacterial species than the microbiota of indoor hens. At the phylum level, microbiota of outdoor hens was enriched for Bacteroidetes (62.41 ± 4.47% of total microbiota in outdoor hens and 52.01 ± 6.27% in indoor hens) and Proteobacteria (9.33 ± 4.99% in outdoor and 5.47 ± 2.24% in indoor hens). On the other hand, Firmicutes were more abundant in the microbiota of indoor hens (33.28 ± 5.11% in indoor and 20.66 ± 4.41% in outdoor hens). Horizontally transferrable antibiotic resistance genes tetO, tet(32), tet(44), and tetW were also less abundant in the microbiota of outdoor hens than indoor hens. A comparison of the microbiota composition at the genus and species levels pointed toward isolates specifically adapted to the two extreme environments. However, genera and species recorded as being similarly abundant in the microbiota of indoor and outdoor hens are equally as noteworthy because these represent microbiota members that are highly adapted to chickens, irrespective of their genetics, feed composition, and living environment.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF16_025%2F0007404" target="_blank" >EF16_025/0007404: Gut microbiota with probiotic potential for animal health and welfare</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    MICROORGANISMS

  • ISSN

    2076-2607

  • e-ISSN

    2076-2607

  • Volume of the periodical

    8

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    5

  • Country of publishing house

    CH - SWITZERLAND

  • Number of pages

    11

  • Pages from-to

    767

  • UT code for WoS article

    000540222300148

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85085481979