Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Multicenter Randomized PRAGUE-18 Study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F16%3A10329604" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/16:10329604 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/16:00093173 RIV/00216208:11110/16:10329604 RIV/00216208:11140/16:10329604 RIV/00216208:11150/16:10329604 and 4 more
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024823" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024823</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024823" target="_blank" >10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024823</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Multicenter Randomized PRAGUE-18 Study
Original language description
Background: No randomized head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel has been published in the 7 years since the higher efficacy of these newer P2Y12 inhibitors were first demonstrated relative to clopidogrel. Methods: This academic study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary or immediate percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 1230 patients were randomly assigned across 14 sites to either prasugrel or ticagrelor, which was initiated before percutaneous coronary intervention. Nearly 4% were in cardiogenic shock, and 5.2% were on mechanical ventilation. The primary end point was defined as death, reinfarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, stroke, or serious bleeding requiring transfusion or prolonging hospitalization at 7 days (to reflect primarily the in-hospital phase). This analysis presents data from the first 30 days (key secondary end point). The total follow-up will be 1 year for all patients and will be completed in 2017.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FA - Cardiovascular diseases including cardio-surgery
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Circulation
ISSN
0009-7322
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
134
Issue of the periodical within the volume
21
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
37
Pages from-to
1603-1612
UT code for WoS article
000388466500009
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84996553455