Comparison of four clinical risk scores in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F23%3A10469426" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/23:10469426 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00216208:11110/23:10469426

Result on the web

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=YHW7fuNKDb" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=YHW7fuNKDb</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109949" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.resuscitation.2023.109949</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Comparison of four clinical risk scores in comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Original language description

Background and aims: Several different scoring systems for early risk stratification after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have been developed, but few have been validated in large datasets. The aim of the present study was to compare the well-validated Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) and Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis (CAHP)-scores to the less complex MIRACLE2- and Target Temperature Management (TTM)-scores.Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis of the Targeted Hypothermia versus Targeted Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (TTM2) trial. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. The primary outcome was discriminatory performance assessed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics-curve (AUROC), with the outcome of interest being poor functional outcome or death (modified Rankin Scale 4-6) at 6 months after OHCA.Results: Data on functional outcome at 6 months were available for 1829 cases, which constituted the study population. The pooled AUROC for the MIRACLE2-score was 0.810 (95% CI 0.790-0.828), 0.835 (95% CI 0.816-0.852) for the TTM-score, 0.820 (95% CI 0.800-0.839) for the CAHPscore and 0.770 (95% CI 0.748-0.791) for the OHCA-score. At the cut-offs needed to achieve specificities &gt;95%, sensitivities were &lt;40% for all four scoring systems.Conclusions: The TTM-, MIRACLE2- and CAHP-scores are all capable of providing objective risk estimates accurate enough to be used as part of a holistic patient assessment after OHCA of a suspected cardiac origin. Due to its simplicity, the MIRACLE2-score could be a practical solution for both clinical application and risk stratification within trials.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Project

—

Continuities

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Publication year

2023

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Resuscitation

ISSN

0300-9572

e-ISSN

1873-1570

Volume of the periodical

191

Issue of the periodical within the volume

October

Country of publishing house

IE - IRELAND

Number of pages

9

Pages from-to

109949

UT code for WoS article

001074897900001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85170430206