Generative pre-trained transformer 4o (GPT-4o) in solving text-based multiple response questions for European Diploma in Radiology (EDiR): a comparative study with radiologists
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F25%3A10496386" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/25:10496386 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11110/25:10496386 RIV/00216208:11130/25:10496386 RIV/00064203:_____/25:10496386
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-3VHFRtG8d" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-3VHFRtG8d</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-01941-7" target="_blank" >10.1186/s13244-025-01941-7</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Generative pre-trained transformer 4o (GPT-4o) in solving text-based multiple response questions for European Diploma in Radiology (EDiR): a comparative study with radiologists
Original language description
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the accuracy of generative pre-trained transformer 4o (GPT-4o) in answering multiple response questions from the European Diploma in Radiology (EDiR) examination, comparing its performance to that of human candidates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results from 42 EDiR candidates across Europe were compared to those from 26 fourth-year medical students who answered exclusively using the ChatGPT-4o in a prospective study (October 2024). The challenge consisted of 52 recall or understanding-based EDiR multiple-response questions, all without visual inputs. RESULTS: The GPT-4o achieved a mean score of 82.1 +- 3.0%, significantly outperforming the EDiR candidates with 49.4 +- 10.5% (p < 0.0001). In particular, chatGPT-4o demonstrated higher true positive rates while maintaining lower false positive rates compared to EDiR candidates, with a higher accuracy rate in all radiology subspecialties (p < 0.0001) except informatics (p = 0.20). There was near-perfect agreement between GPT-4 responses (κ = 0.872) and moderate agreement among EDiR participants (κ = 0.334). Exit surveys revealed that all participants used the copy-and-paste feature, and 73% submitted additional questions to clarify responses. CONCLUSIONS: GPT-4o significantly outperformed human candidates in low-order, text-based EDiR multiple-response questions, demonstrating higher accuracy and reliability. These results highlight GPT-4o's potential in answering text-based radiology questions. Further research is necessary to investigate its performance across different question formats and candidate populations to ensure broader applicability and reliability. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: GPT-4o significantly outperforms human candidates in factual radiology text-based questions in the EDiR, excelling especially in identifying correct responses, with a higher accuracy rate compared to radiologists. KEY POINTS: In EDiR text-based questions, ChatGPT-4o scored higher (82%) than EDiR participants (49%). Compared to radiologists, GPT-4o excelled in identifying correct responses. GPT-4o responses demonstrated higher agreement (κ = 0.87) compared to EDiR candidates (κ = 0.33).
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Insights into Imaging
ISSN
1869-4101
e-ISSN
1869-4101
Volume of the periodical
16
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
66
UT code for WoS article
001468337300004
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105000709828