Differences in performing standardized assessment of fine motor skills between czech and slovenian occupational therapists: Nine Hole Peg Test
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F25%3A10496901" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/25:10496901 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11110/25:10496901 RIV/00216208:11130/25:10496901
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=SQehrutM1R" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=SQehrutM1R</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.61983/lcrh.v62i1.90" target="_blank" >10.61983/lcrh.v62i1.90</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Differences in performing standardized assessment of fine motor skills between czech and slovenian occupational therapists: Nine Hole Peg Test
Original language description
Background: For standardized assessment of fine motor skills, therapists use the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT). The subject's task is to put nine pegs into the holes in the pegboard one by one as quickly as possible and then return them to the container, while their time is measured. The aim was to find out whether occupational therapists from the Czech Republic and Slovenia react uniformly in selected specific situations during testing using the NHPT and whether they agree in their evaluation. Methods: An online survey was distributed to Czech and Slovenian occupational therapists in their native languages. It contained short videorecording of situations showing pegs falling on the pegboard, on the table, on the floor or in the lap, as well as pegs bouncing off the container as the attempt is completed. Collected data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results: Answers from 87 Czech and 67 Slovenian therapists showed significant differences between their reactions to specific situations and their ways of evaluating them. They disagreed on the ways of (not) counting the attempt with the specific situation, timing of stopping the attempt, encouraging the completion of attempt, helping to pick up fallen pegs, explaining a repeated attempt, the final position of the pegs after completing the task. Conclusions: For truly objective testing, a NHPT manual containing rules that unify how therapists shall respond to specific situations and evaluate them is essential. Monitoring the frequency of specific situations and the number of initiated attempts to complete the NHPT is recommended.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>SC</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the SCOPUS database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30306 - Sport and fitness sciences
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Rehabilitácia
ISSN
0375-0922
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
62
Issue of the periodical within the volume
1
Country of publishing house
SK - SLOVAKIA
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
"S9"-20
UT code for WoS article
—
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105016876127