All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Fracture Identification on Musculoskeletal Radiographs Using Deep Learning: A Multi-Reader Retrospective Study

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F25%3A10499894" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/25:10499894 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3863-5_4" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3863-5_4</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3863-5_4" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-981-96-3863-5_4</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Fracture Identification on Musculoskeletal Radiographs Using Deep Learning: A Multi-Reader Retrospective Study

  • Original language description

    Fracture detection using radiography is crucial for effective patient management. Despite advances, missed fractures remain a significant issue. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of a deep learning model versus radiologists in identifying fractures on musculoskeletal X-rays. For the purpose of our study, we collected a study sample (n(SAMPLE)) of 600 pediatric and adult radiographs, and retrospectively nSAMPLE the images by two ground truth readers, four radiologists in a multi-reader study with varying experience, and an AI model (Carebot AI Bones 1.2.2 Carebot s.r.o.). The ground truth was reached for 548 images (n(GT)), including 95 fracture cases (n(FRACTURE)) and 453 normal cases (n(NORMAL)). The results demonstrated that the AI system achieved a sensitivity (Se) of 0.884 (0.804-0.934) and a specificity (S-p) of 0.879 (0.845-0.906). In comparison, the radiologists&apos; sensitivity ranged from 0.695 (0.596-0.778) to 0.832 (0.744-0.894) and their specificity ranged from 0.962 (0.941-0.976) to 0.993 (0.981-0.998). The AI model outperformed radiologists in Se across various body parts, particularly in areas with higher fracture prevalence, while showing comparable Sp in some categories. This study highlights the potential of AI to enhance diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    D - Article in proceedings

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30224 - Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2025

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Article name in the collection

    Proceedings of 2024 International Conference on Medical Imaging and Computer-Aided Diagnosis (MICAD 2024)

  • ISBN

    978-981-9638-62-8

  • ISSN

    1876-1100

  • e-ISSN

    1876-1119

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    32-43

  • Publisher name

    Springer

  • Place of publication

    Singapore

  • Event location

    Manchester

  • Event date

    Nov 19, 2024

  • Type of event by nationality

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • UT code for WoS article

    001491664600004