Might simplification of transcatheter aortic valve implantation reduce the burden on hospital resources?
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F22%3A43923339" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/22:43923339 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11120/22:43923339
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac009" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac009</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac009" target="_blank" >10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac009</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Might simplification of transcatheter aortic valve implantation reduce the burden on hospital resources?
Original language description
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) varies considerably in terms of the procedural approach taken and the hospital length of stay (LoS); both directly affect the cost of care. Our coronary and standard cardiology unit aimed to simplify TAVI (and thus shorten the LoS) while maintaining safety. A shorter LoS would also reduce the burden on hospital resources and free up beds for other patients. Data on 214 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI at a single centre between April 2018 and March 2021 were retrospectively collected. A simplified protocol was implemented in January 2020; patients were stratified by whether they underwent TAVI before or after simplification. All procedural phases were simplified. For cost comparison purposes, the LoS was defined as the number of hospitalization days from admission to discharge. The total hospitalization cost was the sum of the direct and indirect (including reallocated overhead) costs. The LoS fell significantly (by 36%) after TAVI simplification. The times in the coronary care unit (CCU) and standard cardiac unit (SCU) also fell significantly (by 33% and 37% respectively). Patients in the simplified TAVI group were discharged, on average, 6 days after admission. The CCU costs decreased by 31% and the SCU costs by 39%. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation simplification did not compromise safety. Indeed, patients who underwent the simplified procedure seemed to develop fewer complications, especially bleeding. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation simplification significantly reduced the LoS and other costs without compromising patient safety.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF16_026%2F0008388" target="_blank" >EF16_026/0008388: Interventional treatment of life-threatening cardiovascular diseases</a><br>
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
European Heart Journal: Supplements
ISSN
1520-765X
e-ISSN
1554-2815
Volume of the periodical
24
Issue of the periodical within the volume
Suppl. B
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
"B28"-"B35"
UT code for WoS article
000780488200007
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85143692432