All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Should minimally invasive approaches in rectal surgery be regarded as a key element of modern enhanced recovery perioperative care?

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F23%3A43925226" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/23:43925226 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11130/23:10430830 RIV/00064203:_____/23:10430830

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2021.1971871" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2021.1971871</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2021.1971871" target="_blank" >10.1080/00015458.2021.1971871</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Should minimally invasive approaches in rectal surgery be regarded as a key element of modern enhanced recovery perioperative care?

  • Original language description

    INTRODUCTION: The aim of study was to assess the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol and minimally invasive approaches on short-term outcomes in rectal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of patients that underwent open or minimally invasive rectal resections in a single institution between January 2015 and April 2020 were included in the study. An ERAS program was introduced in April 2016. The study cohort was divided into three groups: open surgery without ERAS, open surgery with ERAS, and minimally invasive surgery with ERAS. Outcome measures compared were recovery parameters, surgical stress parameters, 30-day morbidity and mortality, oncological radicality and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients were included: 43 in the open non-ERAS group, 92 in the open ERAS group and 67 in the minimally invasive ERAS group. All recovery parameters apart from postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly improved in both ERAS groups. Surgical stress parameters, prolonged postoperative ileus, and hospital stay were significantly reduced in the minimally invasive ERAS group. The overall 30-day morbidity and mortality and oncological radicality did not significantly differ among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive approaches and enhanced recovery care in rectal surgery improve short-term outcomes. Their combination leads to an improvement in recovery parameters and a reduction of prolonged postoperative ileus and hospital stay.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30212 - Surgery

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Acta Chirurgica Belgica

  • ISSN

    0001-5458

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    123

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    2

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    7

  • Pages from-to

    163-169

  • UT code for WoS article

    000691466000001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85113995155