Macular hole Delphi consensus statement (MHOST)
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F23%3A43925826" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/23:43925826 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11120/23:43925826 RIV/00064203:_____/23:10464602
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15682" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15682</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15682" target="_blank" >10.1111/aos.15682</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Macular hole Delphi consensus statement (MHOST)
Original language description
Purpose: To derive a Delphi method-based consensus for the surgical management of Full Thickness Macular Hole (FTMH) and Lamellar Macular Hole (LMH). Methods: 37 expert VR surgeons from 21 mainly European countries participated in Delphi method-based questionnaire for diagnosis and treatment of FTMHs and LMHs. Results: A total of 36 items were rated in round 1 by 37 participants, of which 10 items achieved consensus: intraoperative verification of PVD; clinical superiority of OCT-based FTMH classification; practical ineffectiveness of ocriplasmin; circular 360 degrees ILM peeling for small macular holes; use of regular surgical technique for the size of the hole in concomitant retinal detachment; performing complete vitrectomy; SF6 gas as preferred tamponade; cataract surgery if crystalline lens is mildly/moderately opaque; removal of both ILM and LHEP in LMH surgery. In round 2, 18 items with moderate consensus (45-70% agreement) in round 1 were rated by 35 participants. Final consensus was reached in 35% of questions related to both diagnosis and surgical procedures. Conclusions: This Delphi study provides valuable information about the consensus/disagreement on different scenarios encountered during FTMH and LMH management as a guide tosurgical decision-making. High rate of disagreement and/or variable approaches still exist for treating such relatively common conditions.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30207 - Ophthalmology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Others
Publication year
2023
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Acta Ophthalmologica
ISSN
1755-375X
e-ISSN
1755-3768
Volume of the periodical
101
Issue of the periodical within the volume
7
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
815-825
UT code for WoS article
000992694400001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85159106744