Classifications of haemodialysis vascular access stenosis: a scoping review
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F25%3A43927883" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/25:43927883 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00023001:_____/25:00085353 RIV/00216208:11110/25:10490438 RIV/00216208:11120/25:43927883 RIV/00216208:11130/25:10490438 RIV/00064165:_____/25:10490438
Result on the web
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088045" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088045</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088045" target="_blank" >10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088045</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Classifications of haemodialysis vascular access stenosis: a scoping review
Original language description
OBJECTIVES: Vascular access (VA) stenoses play a significant role in the morbidity of the haemodialysed population. Classifications for diagnosis, assessment and proposal of treatment strategies can be useful clinical and methodological tools. This review aims to present a comprehensive summary and propose further methodological approaches. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature, evaluating classifications for dialysis-related VA stenosis. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched from inception to 7 December 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All articles containing classifications regarding dialysis VA were eligible, with no restrictions on the study type or language of the full text. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent researchers performed the search and initial screening. Four vascular surgeons assessed the included classifications using a modified Buchbinder's critical appraisal tool to evaluate quality. RESULTS: From 4771 screened papers, 59 full-text papers were retrieved and 24 articles contained classifications. Three classifications were dedicated to VA stenosis, all based on the anatomical location of lesions. According to the modified Buchbinder's appraisal, the classifications were assessed as moderate-to-good quality. The literature disposes of immense inconsistency in terms of the definition of significant stenosis indicated for treatment. CONCLUSIONS: VA significant stenosis and its classification is a non-uniformly understood issue with many different criteria and categorisations. This basic methodological problem leads to inconsistent results. We recommend the unification of the criteria and their validation in prospective studies.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/LX22NPO5104" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5104: National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
BMJ Open
ISSN
2044-6055
e-ISSN
2044-6055
Volume of the periodical
15
Issue of the periodical within the volume
January
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
"e088045"
UT code for WoS article
001400713400001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85215440910