Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064173%3A_____%2F25%3A43928329" target="_blank" >RIV/00064173:_____/25:43928329 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/00216208:11120/25:43928329 RIV/00216208:11150/25:10497110

Result on the web

<a href="https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.04.05" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.04.05</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.04.05" target="_blank" >10.18240/ijo.2025.04.05</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses

Original language description

AIM: To compare the 12-month outcomes of visual performance and patient satisfaction of a higher-order aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a conventional monofocal IOL. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, comparative, double-blinded study including 22 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 IOL in one eye (ICB00 group) and the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL in the fellow eye (ZCB00 group). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuities (DCNVA) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. Contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, and reading text size were also evaluated. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire at the 6-month postoperative visit. RESULTS: Mean postoperative logMAR UDVA was 0.01+-0.12 and -0.02+-0.10 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.37). Mean logMAR UIVA was 0.32+-0.19 and 0.45+-0.16 in ICB00 and ZCB00 groups, respectively (P=0.010). Differences between groups in UNVA did not reach statistical significance (P=0.16). The intermediate reading acuity at 66 cm (P=0.02) and 80 cm (P=0.04) was significantly better in the ICB00 group. Postoperative contrast sensitivity results did not differ significantly between groups (P&gt;0.05). Patients reported high overall satisfaction, with 62% of patients using spectacles for reading in everyday life. CONCLUSION: The eyes of patients implanted with the enhanced monofocal IOL evaluated have significantly better visual acuity for intermediate distances with the same contrast sensitivity as a conventional monofocal IOL.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30207 - Ophthalmology

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2025

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

International Journal of Ophthalmology

ISSN

2222-3959

e-ISSN

2227-4898

Volume of the periodical

18

Issue of the periodical within the volume

4

Country of publishing house

CN - CHINA

Number of pages

8

Pages from-to

598-605

UT code for WoS article

001456356200005

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-105001142964