Comparison of the results of miniinvasive treatment of stress urinary incontinence using Ajust and MiniArc system

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064190%3A_____%2F12%3A%230000345" target="_blank" >RIV/00064190:_____/12:#0000345 - isvavai.cz</a>
Result on the web
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Comparison of the results of miniinvasive treatment of stress urinary incontinence using Ajust and MiniArc system
Original language description
The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of two minimally invasive surgical techniques for stress urinary incontinence in female patients (Ajust and MiniArc), using subjective assessment as well as evaluation of objective parameters. Methods: A total of sixty-six female patients with stress urinary incontinence were enrolled into the prospective, randomized, multicentre trial, mean age 57.8 years (range 42-88 years). Patients in Group A had undergone surgery using Ajust method; patients inGroup B underwent surgery using the MiniArc method. The subjective satisfaction of the patients along with the outcome of the procedure was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire "The International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI-Q)". The objective assessment was performed with the use of cough test, urodynamics (bladder volume at the first desire to void - FDV, cytometric capacity - CC, maximum urethral closure pressure - MUCP, maximum urinary flow - Qmax), and ultrasound parame
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FP - Other medical fields
OECD FORD branch
—

Publication year
2012
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)