Differences in evaluation methods of trunk sway using different MoCap systems
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F14%3A10292838" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/14:10292838 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/68407700:21460/14:00221616 RIV/00216208:11130/14:10292838 RIV/61989592:15510/14:33149220
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5277/abb140210" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5277/abb140210</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5277/abb140210" target="_blank" >10.5277/abb140210</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Differences in evaluation methods of trunk sway using different MoCap systems
Original language description
The position of the trunk can be negatively influenced by many diseases. Several methods can be used for identifying defects in balance and coordination as a result of pathology of the musculoskeletal or nervous system. The aim of this article is to examine the relationship between the three methods used for analysis of trunk sway and compare two fundamentally different MoCap systems. We used a camera system and a 3DOF orientation tracker placed on subject's trunk, and measured inclination (roll) and flexion (pitch) during quiet stance. Ten healthy participants in the study were measured with eyes open and closed. The pitch versus roll plots of trunk were formed, and the area of the convex hull, area of confidence ellipse and total length of the trajectory of the pitch versus roll plot were calculated. The statistical analysis was performed and strong correlation between the area of the convex hull and area of the confidence ellipse was found. Also, the results show moderate correlatio
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
BO - Biophysics
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/VG20102015002" target="_blank" >VG20102015002: Flexiguard</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2014
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
ISSN
1509-409X
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
16
Issue of the periodical within the volume
2
Country of publishing house
PL - POLAND
Number of pages
10
Pages from-to
85-94
UT code for WoS article
000340324900010
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—