Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: Indications, modalities, and techniques
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F16%3A10329621" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/16:10329621 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11130/16:10329621
Result on the web
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.13515" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.13515</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.13515" target="_blank" >10.1111/epi.13515</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: Indications, modalities, and techniques
Original language description
Many patients with medically refractory epilepsy now undergo successful surgery based on noninvasive diagnostic information, but intracranial electroencephalography (IEEG) continues to be used as increasingly complex cases are considered surgical candidates. The indications for IEEG and the modalities employed vary across epilepsy surgical centers; each modality has its advantages and limitations. IEEG can be performed in the same intraoperative setting, that is, intraoperative electrocorticography, or through an independent implantation procedure with chronic extraoperative recordings; the latter are not only resource intensive but also carry risk. A lack of understanding of IEEG limitations predisposes to data misinterpretation that can lead to denying surgery when indicated or, worse yet, incorrect resection with adverse outcomes. Given the lack of class 1 or 2 evidence on IEEG, a consensus-based expert recommendation on the diagnostic utility of IEEG is presented, with emphasis on the application of various modalities in specific substrates or locations, taking into account their relative efficacy, safety, ease, and incremental cost-benefit. These recommendations aim to curtail outlying indications that risk the over- or underutilization of IEEG, while retaining substantial flexibility in keeping with most standard practices at epilepsy centers and addressing some of the needs of resource-poor regions around the world.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)
CEP classification
FH - Neurology, neuro-surgery, nuero-sciences
OECD FORD branch
—
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2016
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Epilepsia
ISSN
0013-9580
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
57
Issue of the periodical within the volume
11
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
1735-1747
UT code for WoS article
000387652200003
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-84994430952