All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: Indications, modalities, and techniques

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F16%3A10329621" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/16:10329621 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216208:11130/16:10329621

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.13515" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.13515</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.13515" target="_blank" >10.1111/epi.13515</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: Indications, modalities, and techniques

  • Original language description

    Many patients with medically refractory epilepsy now undergo successful surgery based on noninvasive diagnostic information, but intracranial electroencephalography (IEEG) continues to be used as increasingly complex cases are considered surgical candidates. The indications for IEEG and the modalities employed vary across epilepsy surgical centers; each modality has its advantages and limitations. IEEG can be performed in the same intraoperative setting, that is, intraoperative electrocorticography, or through an independent implantation procedure with chronic extraoperative recordings; the latter are not only resource intensive but also carry risk. A lack of understanding of IEEG limitations predisposes to data misinterpretation that can lead to denying surgery when indicated or, worse yet, incorrect resection with adverse outcomes. Given the lack of class 1 or 2 evidence on IEEG, a consensus-based expert recommendation on the diagnostic utility of IEEG is presented, with emphasis on the application of various modalities in specific substrates or locations, taking into account their relative efficacy, safety, ease, and incremental cost-benefit. These recommendations aim to curtail outlying indications that risk the over- or underutilization of IEEG, while retaining substantial flexibility in keeping with most standard practices at epilepsy centers and addressing some of the needs of resource-poor regions around the world.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    FH - Neurology, neuro-surgery, nuero-sciences

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2016

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Epilepsia

  • ISSN

    0013-9580

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    57

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    11

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    13

  • Pages from-to

    1735-1747

  • UT code for WoS article

    000387652200003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-84994430952