EAHP statements survey 2016: sections 1, 3 and 4 of the European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F17%3A10373755" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/17:10373755 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001334" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001334</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001334" target="_blank" >10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001334</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

EAHP statements survey 2016: sections 1, 3 and 4 of the European Statements of Hospital Pharmacy

Original language description

Background The 2016 European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP) Statements survey builds on previous surveys and focuses on sections 1, 3 and 4. Objective To collect statistical data about the level of implementation of the Statements, and identify important barriers to their implementation. Methods An online questionnaire was sent to all hospital pharmacies in EAHP member countries. Data were analysed by researchers from Keele University School of Pharmacy, UK and the EAHP Survey Group. If an incomplete survey was submitted, the quantitative data were not used, although any free-text responses were incorporated. Results The overall response rate was 16% (904 out of 5711 requests) with 730 complete responses. In the first part of the survey, data were collected on the hospital pharmacy setting. While almost half (n=335) of hospital pharmacies served over 500 beds, 77% (n=564) of hospital pharmacies had &lt;= 10 pharmacists. In section B, evidence was gathered about the degree of implementation of sections 1, 3 and 4 of the Statements and the main barriers to, and drivers of, implementation. The questions related to production and compounding (section 3) received very positive responses (all questions from this section received at least a 70% positive response rate), indicating that responders are having less difficulty implementing these statements compared with others. The introductory statements and governance questions (section 1) received a more mixed response. Only 343 (47%) responses indicated that the pharmacists worked routinely as part of multidisciplinary team. Many of the questions relating to clinical pharmacy services (section 4) received a more negative response overall, with six questions receiving &lt;50% positive responses. Conclusions This iteration of the survey provides the EAHP with further insight into the implementation of the Statements across the member countries as well as the barriers to, and drivers of, implementation in sections 1, 3 and 4. This is essential to inform the plans for EAHP to best support their implementation.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30104 - Pharmacology and pharmacy

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2017

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy: Science and Practice

ISSN

2047-9956

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

24

Issue of the periodical within the volume

5

Country of publishing house

GB - UNITED KINGDOM

Number of pages

8

Pages from-to

258-265

UT code for WoS article

000412654900003

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85030106692