Preservation of orbit in tumor invasion through the periorbita in sinonasal malignancy
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F24%3A10481868" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/24:10481868 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11110/24:10481868 RIV/00216208:11130/24:10481868
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Xv7qIubfBw" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=Xv7qIubfBw</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08757-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00405-024-08757-z</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Preservation of orbit in tumor invasion through the periorbita in sinonasal malignancy
Original language description
Objective: One of the possible risks of sinonasal malignancy is its possible spread in the orbit. However, there is no clear consensus among the different departments as to whether it is necessary to exenterate the orbit in limited tumorous infiltration of periorbital fat. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate that periorbital infiltration and periorbital fat invasion without involvement of deeper orbital tissues are not the indication of orbital exenteration. Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis was performed over a 17-year period of patients undergoing surgical treatment for sinonasal malignancy with histologically verified periorbital infiltration or deeper invasion into the orbit. A total of 32 patients were included in the study. For each group, the following data were analysed: sex, age, preoperative imaging studies, histological findings, site of origin, stage, surgical reconstruction, oncological treatment, survival, cause of death, number of recurrences in the orbit and functional status of preserved eyes. Results: Based on our criteria for orbital exenteration, orbital preservation was feasible in 18 patients. Orbital exenteration was performed in 14 patients with deeper tumor infiltration. There was a statistically insignificant difference in survival between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 44% for the orbital preservation group (only 2 patients died from local tumor recurrence) and 34% for the orbital exenteration group. The groups did not differ in other observed factors other than the extent of orbital infiltration. In 11 (61.1%) patients, vision was without significant change after radiation therapy. In 2 (11.1%) patients, visual function was impaired due to diplopia. 5 (27.8%) patients had severely impaired vision due to optic nerve atrophy after radiation therapy. Conclusions: Our results show a relatively high survival rate in the group of patients with orbital preservation with a high chance of vision preservation, which justifies our approach to orbital preservation even in some tumors with periorbital infiltration.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30206 - Otorhinolaryngology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
ISSN
0937-4477
e-ISSN
1434-4726
Volume of the periodical
281
Issue of the periodical within the volume
10
Country of publishing house
DE - GERMANY
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
5303-5310
UT code for WoS article
001281815100006
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85196764056