Effectiveness of Mandibular Advancement Device for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F25%3A10505489" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/25:10505489 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11130/25:10505489
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=KD36PcCF8a" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=KD36PcCF8a</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46292/sci24-00062" target="_blank" >10.46292/sci24-00062</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Effectiveness of Mandibular Advancement Device for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Original language description
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a mandibular advancement device (MAD) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who suffer from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome, and to identify potential predictive factors of response to MAD. METHODS: Forty individuals (34 men and 6 women) with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of more than 15 were included in the MAD uncontrolled clinical trial. The outcomes were evaluated through polygraphic examination before therapy and after 1 and 6 months. Subjective daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) and quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) were assessed at baseline and after 6 months. Throughout the study, side effects were continuously monitored. RESULTS: Thirty-five individuals completed the study. The mean AHI decreased from 35.7 ± 15.6 to 18.5 ± 10.6 at 6 months (P < .0001). ESS improved from 9.3 ± 5.2 to 6.8 ± 3.5 (P = .0001), while no significant change was observed in WHOQOL-BREF scores. Participants with severe (AHI >30) OSA had shorter time since injury and higher body mass index (BMI) than those with moderate OSA (AHI 15-30). According to the criterion for treatment success of at least 50% improvement in AHI, MADs were effective in 48.6% of participants. Younger age and lower WHOQOL-BREF scores were the only factors significantly associated with treatment success. CONCLUSION: MADs appear to be an effective treatment for both moderate and severe OSA in people with SCI. They may be a suitable alternative for individuals who decline or are unable to tolerate continuous positive airway pressure therapy.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30306 - Sport and fitness sciences
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
ISSN
1082-0744
e-ISSN
1945-5763
Volume of the periodical
31
Issue of the periodical within the volume
4
Country of publishing house
US - UNITED STATES
Number of pages
13
Pages from-to
147-159
UT code for WoS article
001629479600010
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-105022522394