Compressive and traumatic neuropathies of the deep branch of the radial nerve - a retrospective analysis of surgically treated cases
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F25%3A10513321" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/25:10513321 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11130/25:10513321
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=iSwaIxBt6_" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=iSwaIxBt6_</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.48095/cccsnn2025349" target="_blank" >10.48095/cccsnn2025349</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Compressive and traumatic neuropathies of the deep branch of the radial nerve - a retrospective analysis of surgically treated cases
Original language description
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment for compressive and traumatic neuropathies of the deep branch of the radial nerve (DBRN), with an additional focus on epidemiology, anatomical considerations linked to DBRN lesions, and complications. Materials and methodology: Records of patients surgically treated for peripheral nerve lesions were retrospectively reviewed to compile data on demographic details, anatomical location of the lesion, surgical management, outcomes, and complications. The primary outcome measure was the Louisiana State University and 7 traumatic neuropathies, were included. The median fol low-up was 17.5 (14- 41) months. Surgical intervention led to a signifi cant improvement in the LSUHSC score in both the compressive (from 2 [0- 31 to 4 [2- 51; P = 0.018) and the traumatic neuropathy group (from 0 [0- 01 to 3 [0- 41; P = 0.011). The traumatic neuropathy group exhibited a significantly lower preoperative LSUHSC score (P = 0.004), but the difference in postoperative scores was not significant (P = 0.129). Primary surgical treatment failed in 26.7% of patients with compression and in 28.6% of patients with DBRN injury. Tendon transfer presented a viable solution for patients with failed primary treatment. Conclusion: Surgical treatment provides significant functional improvement in patients with compressive and traumatic neuropathies of the DBRN. However, a considerable percentage of patients in both groups experienced primary treatment failure. Although patients with traumatic neuropathies of the DBRN presented with a worse preoperative functional status, the postoperative outcomes between both groups were comparable.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie
ISSN
1210-7859
e-ISSN
1802-4041
Volume of the periodical
88
Issue of the periodical within the volume
6
Country of publishing house
CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
349-356
UT code for WoS article
001692112000001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—