Breathing Out Completely Before Inhalation: The Most Problematic Step in Application Technique in Patients With Non-Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064211%3A_____%2F19%3AW0000024" target="_blank" >RIV/00064211:_____/19:W0000024 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00109448 RIV/00216208:11150/19:10400888 RIV/00216208:11160/19:10400888 RIV/65269705:_____/19:00070529 RIV/00179906:_____/19:10400888
Result on the web
<a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2019.00241/full" target="_blank" >https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2019.00241/full</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00241" target="_blank" >10.3389/fphar.2019.00241</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Breathing Out Completely Before Inhalation: The Most Problematic Step in Application Technique in Patients With Non-Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Original language description
Background: Patient adherence to an inhaled medication application technique (A-AppIT) represents a major health-care issue in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is a lack of studies evaluating this issue thoroughly. The aim of our study was to introduce a universal easy-to-use method of assessing the A-AppIT to chronic medication in moderate to very severe COPD individuals. Methods: The Czech Multicenter Research Database of COPD (COPD CMRD), a large observational prospective study, was used as a source of clinical data. A-AppIT was evaluated using our Five Steps Assessment. This measure is based on dichotomous evaluation of each of five predefined consecutive application technique steps and can be used in all settings for all currently available inhalation systems in COPD subjects. Results: A total of 546 participants (75.0% men; mean age 66.7 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1s 44.7%) were available for analysis. This represents 69.6% of all patients recruited in the COPD CMRD. Less than one third of patients presented their application technique without any erroneous steps. The most problematic steps were breathing out completely in one breath immediately before inhalation (step No. 3), and the actual inhalation maneuver (step No. 4). The total number of errors was similar for dry powder inhalers and pressurized metered-dose inhalers. Conclusion: Our novel instrument, Five Steps Assessment, is comfortable for use in routine clinical practice to explore A-AppIT. The A-AppIT in real-life patients with non-mild COPD was inadequate and patients should be repeatedly trained by properly (re-)educated medical staff.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30104 - Pharmacology and pharmacy
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2019
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN
1663-9812
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
10
Issue of the periodical within the volume
MAR 12
Country of publishing house
CH - SWITZERLAND
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
-
UT code for WoS article
000460973800001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—