(2940-2941) Proposals to conserve the name Amanita fulva with a conserved type against Agaricus badius and Agaricus trilobus and the name Amanita spadicea with a conserved type (Basidiomycota)

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00094862%3A_____%2F23%3AN0000046" target="_blank" >RIV/00094862:_____/23:N0000046 - isvavai.cz</a>

Result on the web

<a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.12916" target="_blank" >https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.12916</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tax.12916" target="_blank" >10.1002/tax.12916</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

(2940-2941) Proposals to conserve the name Amanita fulva with a conserved type against Agaricus badius and Agaricus trilobus and the name Amanita spadicea with a conserved type (Basidiomycota)

Original language description

By these typifications, Agaricus trilobus and Amanita badia are fixed as earlier synonyms of Am. fulva (Art. 11.4). However, considering the broad use of the latter name during two centuries, we believe that replacing it by Am. badia would introduce much disturbance, as mentions of that name are few and ambiguous (24 bibliographic mentions found, at least 3 of them illustrating Am. fulvoides), whereas Am. fulva scores at least 137 mentions in European literature, including popular books and identification guides. Furthermore, Ag. trilo- bus, which would take precedence over Am. fulva as a homotypic synonym, has never been in use during the last two centuries. For this reason, we think that conservation of Am. fulva with the proposed conserved type would contribute to the stability of nomenclature in this group, in contrast to the revival of a name with multiple interpretations and another (“trilobus”) having never been in use and with an epithet referring to a feature without taxonomic significance. Amanita spadicea could be lectotypified by one of the two elements cited by Persoon in the protologue: t. CCXLV of Schaeffer (1771), which is the lectotype of Agaricus badius, or by t. CXV (1762), which is referable to Am. fulva, making Am. spadicea a homotypic synonym of one of the two names. This would force the creation of a new name for a well-defined species currently named Am. spadicea. Our aim here is to avoid this unnecessary nomenclatural move, by preserving Am. spadicea in an unequivocal interpretation.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

10612 - Mycology

Project

—

Continuities

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Publication year

2023

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Taxon

ISSN

0040-0262

e-ISSN

1996-8175

Volume of the periodical

72

Issue of the periodical within the volume

2

Country of publishing house

US - UNITED STATES

Number of pages

3

Pages from-to

425–427

UT code for WoS article

001011038500013

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85153721495