All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

How to distinguish unfinished leaf points and bifacial knives? Testing theoretical assumptions on bifaces from Moravský Krumlov IV, Layer 0

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00094862%3A_____%2F24%3A10000418" target="_blank" >RIV/00094862:_____/24:10000418 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    How to distinguish unfinished leaf points and bifacial knives? Testing theoretical assumptions on bifaces from Moravský Krumlov IV, Layer 0

  • Original language description

    With the undeniable shift in knowledge about the technology of stone industry production, the classification of lithic collections can be in some cases complicated despite the existence of typical fossiles directeurs. This problem clearly arises, for example, in two transitional industries of the EUP complex. Traditionally, the Micoquian is characterised by asymmetrical bifacial tools, while symmetrical leaf points define the Szeletian. Symmetry or asymmetry in general is relatively simple to identify on finished products, but their recognition in unfinished preforms and broken pieces is a complex issue. The symmetry or asymmetry of a bifacial tool can depend on the preserved shaping stage and therefore the use of traditional morphological description can lead to mistakes. In further studies, we therefore propose to analyse rather the technological symmetries/asymmetries of the preform using a Knapping Asymmetry Measure method (part of a scar pattern analysis). In an ideal case, refittings can support this analysis because they record earlier stages of the shaping. The Layer 0 assemblage from Moravský Krumlov IV gives us a perfect opportunity to evaluate the theoretical assumptions due to the absolute lack of finished pieces at the site and the ambiguous morphology of the assemblage. Both refitting and Knapping Asymmetry Measure methods yielded results that confirm the production of leaf points at Moravský Krumlov IV.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    C - Chapter in a specialist book

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    60102 - Archaeology

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2024

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Book/collection name

    STONE AGE Studying Technologies of Non-analogous Environments and Glacial Ecosystems Papers in Honor of Jürgen Richter

  • ISBN

    978-3-7749-4427-5

  • Number of pages of the result

    18

  • Pages from-to

    489-506

  • Number of pages of the book

    605

  • Publisher name

    Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH

  • Place of publication

    Bonn

  • UT code for WoS chapter