Prospective comparison of cervical ripening with double balloon Cook catheter, misoprostol or dinoprostone in term singleton pregnancies

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00098892%3A_____%2F23%3A10158178" target="_blank" >RIV/00098892:_____/23:10158178 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/61989592:15110/23:73620370

Result on the web

<a href="https://journals.viamedica.pl/ginekologia_polska/article/view/85363" target="_blank" >https://journals.viamedica.pl/ginekologia_polska/article/view/85363</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2022.0023" target="_blank" >10.5603/GP.a2022.0023</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Prospective comparison of cervical ripening with double balloon Cook catheter, misoprostol or dinoprostone in term singleton pregnancies

Original language description

Objectives: Induction of labor is indicated if the risk of continuing pregnancy is higher (either for fetus or mother) than the risk associated with the induction itself. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of the double balloon Cook catheter and pharmacological preparations — prostaglandins (PGE), in our case it was misoprostol (PGE1) or dinoprostone (PGE2) for cervical ripening in pregnant women with gestational age at term. Material and methods: The prospective observational study was conducted from March 2017 to December 2018. We used mechanical and pharmacological methods for cervical ripening. We compared the efficiency of methods and time to delivery from start of cervical ripening. We also evaluated the neonatal complications by Apgar score and neonatal intensive care unit admission in three different groups. Results: Two hundred and nine women were chosen for cervical ripening. Double balloon Cook catheter and misoprostol were equally efficient in achieving vaginal delivery (76%). The shortest time for cervical ripening and successful vaginal delivery was shown in misoprostol (PGE1) group. In conclusion, no significant differences were found between groups in all neonatal outcomes. Conclusions: Currently, many methods of delivery preinduction exist and the prevalence of their usage varies considerably between countries. As yet, there is no literature comparing these three methods for the preparation of cervix.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology

Project

—

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2023

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Ginekologia Polska

ISSN

0017-0011

e-ISSN

2543-6767

Volume of the periodical

94

Issue of the periodical within the volume

3

Country of publishing house

PL - POLAND

Number of pages

8

Pages from-to

221-228

UT code for WoS article

000950935900001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85152430305