Comparison of capabilities and limitations of endoscopes in endoscopic ear surgeries using 3D printed models

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00098892%3A_____%2F24%3A10158597" target="_blank" >RIV/00098892:_____/24:10158597 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/61989592:15110/24:73624012

Result on the web

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924000127?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924000127?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104226" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104226</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Comparison of capabilities and limitations of endoscopes in endoscopic ear surgeries using 3D printed models

Original language description

Purpose: Endoscopic ear surgery has become a popular operative approach to treat middle ear diseases. Surgeons use either 0° or 30° endoscopes worldwide. The main aim of the work was to compare the properties of these two types of endoscopes. Material and methods: Since this type of evaluation is hard to perform in vivo during the actual surgery, we designed 3D printed temporal bone models with different levels of complexity. The evaluation of endoscopes was based on image analysis or visibility of anatomical structures. Results: The results show that a 30° endoscope offers a view of lateral walls from 4 mm distance, contrary to a 0° endoscope which cannot see lateral walls from this distance at all. On the other hand, visible area of the anterior wall is up to 40 % larger using 0° endoscope, compared to 30° endoscope. Angled endoscope distorts the picture and leads to the deterioration of the image. At commonly used distances above 5 mm from middle ear structures, resolution and image distortion is comparable between both endoscopes. Conclusions: Our results do not offer a definitive opinion on which endoscope is better for ear surgery. Both types of endoscopes have advantages and disadvantages, and the choice depends on the surgeon&apos;s personal preference and on the type of planned procedure.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

30206 - Otorhinolaryngology

Project

<a href="/en/project/EF19_073%2F0016713" target="_blank" >EF19_073/0016713: Improving schematics of Doctoral student grant competition and their pilot implementation</a><br>

Continuities

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year

2024

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

American Journal of Otolaryngology

ISSN

0196-0709

e-ISSN

1532-818X

Volume of the periodical

45

Issue of the periodical within the volume

3

Country of publishing house

US - UNITED STATES

Number of pages

8

Pages from-to

104226

UT code for WoS article

001175621100001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85184063121