Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care and use of GRADE: a systematic review protocol
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F21%3A00075568" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/21:00075568 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00123478 RIV/61989592:15410/21:73614895
Result on the web
<a href="https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/12/e052795" target="_blank" >https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/12/e052795</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052795" target="_blank" >10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052795</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for perioperative care and use of GRADE: a systematic review protocol
Original language description
Introduction Perioperative care is a broad field covering an array of elective and emergency procedures. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for perioperative care exist with various degrees of methodological quality. We intend to critically appraise them using AGREE II instrument and investigate the use of Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). Methods and analysis We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PROSPERO and did not identify any similar systematic review in this area. We will search databases, repositories and websites of guideline developers and medical societies, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), DynaMed, the GIN international guideline library and registry of guidelines in development, BIGG international database of GRADE guidelines, ECRI Guideline Trust or National Institute for Clinical Evidence to identify all CPGs for perioperative care in an adult population in a general clinical setting. We will include CPGs, expert guidance, position papers, guidance documents and consensus statements published in the last 5 years by experts or international organisations that provide guidance or recommendations in the available full text with no geographical or language limitation. Excluded will be those containing only good practice statements. Two independent reviewers will perform critical appraisal using the AGREE II tool. The data presented in a narrative and tabular form will include the results of the critical appraisal for all identified CPGs for all AGREE II domains and an assessment of the use of the GRADE approach. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required. We will disseminate the findings through professional networks and conference presentations and will publish the results.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30218 - General and internal medicine
Result continuities
Project
<a href="/en/project/EF19_073%2F0016943" target="_blank" >EF19_073/0016943: Internal grant agency of Masaryk University</a><br>
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2021
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
BMJ OPEN
ISSN
2044-6055
e-ISSN
—
Volume of the periodical
11
Issue of the periodical within the volume
12
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
4
Pages from-to
—
UT code for WoS article
000730777400026
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—