Is the vertex a good control stimulation site? Theta burst stimulation in healthy controls
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F22%3A00076326" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/22:00076326 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14740/22:00125326
Result on the web
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00702-022-02466-9" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00702-022-02466-9</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00702-022-02466-9" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00702-022-02466-9</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Is the vertex a good control stimulation site? Theta burst stimulation in healthy controls
Original language description
The vertex has been used as a suitable control stimulation site in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. The objectives of this study are (1) to assess cognitive performance (CP) after theta burst stimulation (TBS); (2) to evaluate whether clinically relevant cortical areas might be reached by vertex stimulation and how that might influence CP. Twenty young healthy subjects performed a cognitive task prior to and immediately after intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS) of two active cortical stimulation sites and the vertex. We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare the pre- and post-stimulation reaction times (RTs) and a mixed ANOVA analysis to evaluate the effect of the stimulation on changes in RTs. A three-dimensional finite-element model (FEM) was used to calculate the vertex TBS-induced electrical field (E-field) in the adjacent regions of interest (ROIs). Correlation analyses were performed between E-fields in the ROIs and cognitive outcomes. We found a significant effect only of the stimulation time factor (F (1,12) = 65.37, p < 0.001) on RT shortening, with no superiority of the active site stimulation compared to the vertex stimulation. In 73.5% of vertex TBS sessions, a significant E-field was induced in at least one ROI. We found a negative association between the magnitude of the iTBS-induced E-fields and RT changes (R = - 0.54, p = 0.04). TBS protocols may lead to changes in CP when applied over the craniometrically targeted vertex. We therefore suggest not using a conventional approach as a vertex targeting method.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30103 - Neurosciences (including psychophysiology)
Result continuities
Project
Result was created during the realization of more than one project. More information in the Projects tab.
Continuities
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Others
Publication year
2022
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Journal of Neural Transmission
ISSN
0300-9564
e-ISSN
1435-1463
Volume of the periodical
129
Issue of the periodical within the volume
3
Country of publishing house
AT - AUSTRIA
Number of pages
11
Pages from-to
319-329
UT code for WoS article
000746752700001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
—