All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Post-acute phase and sequelae management of epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary DELPHI-based consensus

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00159816%3A_____%2F23%3A00078790" target="_blank" >RIV/00159816:_____/23:00078790 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/00216224:14110/23:00130693

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://ojrd.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13023-023-02631-7" target="_blank" >https://ojrd.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13023-023-02631-7</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-02631-7" target="_blank" >10.1186/s13023-023-02631-7</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Post-acute phase and sequelae management of epidermal necrolysis: an international, multidisciplinary DELPHI-based consensus

  • Original language description

    BackgroundLong-term sequelae are frequent and often disabling after epidermal necrolysis (Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)). However, consensus on the modalities of management of these sequelae is lacking.ObjectivesWe conducted an international multicentric DELPHI exercise to establish a multidisciplinary expert consensus to standardize recommendations regarding management of SJS/TEN sequelae.MethodsParticipants were sent a survey via the online tool &quot;Survey Monkey&quot; consisting of 54 statements organized into 8 topics: general recommendations, professionals involved, skin, oral mucosa and teeth, eyes, genital area, mental health, and allergy workup. Participants evaluated the level of appropriateness of each statement on a scale of 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). Results were analyzed according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.ResultsFifty-two healthcare professionals participated. After the first round, a consensus was obtained for 100% of 54 initially proposed statements (disagreement index &lt; 1). Among them, 50 statements were agreed upon as &apos;appropriate&apos;; four statements were considered &apos;uncertain&apos;, and ultimately finally discarded.ConclusionsOur DELPHI-based expert consensus should help guide physicians in conducting a prolonged multidisciplinary follow-up of sequelae in SJS-TEN.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30100 - Basic medicine

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases

  • ISSN

    1750-1172

  • e-ISSN

    1750-1172

  • Volume of the periodical

    18

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    GB - UNITED KINGDOM

  • Number of pages

    10

  • Pages from-to

  • UT code for WoS article

    000949025400003

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database