All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of volume measurements of mass standards at low pressures and in liquids

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00177016%3A_____%2F22%3AN0000032" target="_blank" >RIV/00177016:_____/22:N0000032 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6501/ac51ef" target="_blank" >https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6501/ac51ef</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac51ef" target="_blank" >10.1088/1361-6501/ac51ef</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of volume measurements of mass standards at low pressures and in liquids

  • Original language description

    The determination of the volumes of mass standards is key to the precise determination of their masses, due to the effect of the air buoyancy force. The buoyancy force can either be reduced by mass determination at low pressure or enlarged for a determination of the apparent mass using a vessel filled with liquid. The standard method for the volume calibration of weights is comparison in liquid, as described in the document OIML R111. This report presents the results of calibrating the volumes of stainless-steel mass standards with a nominal mass of 1 kg at low pressure and in a liquid. The authors showed that both methods produced comparable results with maximum differences of 0.002 cm3 when adjusted for a standard temperature of 20 °C. The typical uncertainty in the volumes given by both methods is 0.002 cm3. A major source of uncertainty is the volume of the reference weight. The authors conclude that both methods produce consistent results, so that the method of volume calibration at low pressure can be used instead of hydrostatic weighing. The advantage of this approach is that both the masses and volumes of the weights are measured using the same mass comparator, which requires less manipulation. This study will help to establish the procedures for the dissemination and transfer of the mass unit from vacuum to ambient conditions in the institute of the author.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20302 - Applied mechanics

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2022

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Measurement Science and Technology

  • ISSN

    0957-0233

  • e-ISSN

    1361-6501

  • Volume of the periodical

    33

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    6

  • Country of publishing house

    US - UNITED STATES

  • Number of pages

    9

  • Pages from-to

    064005

  • UT code for WoS article

    000771181000001

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database