All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Bilateral comparison of CMI and SMU up to 900 MPa

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00177016%3A_____%2F23%3AN0000089" target="_blank" >RIV/00177016:_____/23:N0000089 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/noindex/2023/05/22/CCM%20Program%20Book.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/noindex/2023/05/22/CCM%20Program%20Book.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Bilateral comparison of CMI and SMU up to 900 MPa

  • Original language description

    A novel instrument on the market, type BH5-10000B by company Aréméca, was purchased by the CMI. It has a nominal working range from 0.02 GPa to 1 GPa. It was calibrated by the CMI up to 0.5 GPa in autumn 2021. However, due to the low range of this calibration, a question remained whether to use a linear or a quadratic approximation of effective area dependence on pressure. Meanwhile, the Slovak Metrology Institute (SMU) utilized a novel stand of its own design as a base for a commercial tungsten-carbide piston-cylinder by company Desgranges et Huot. The SMU calibrated it up to 0.2 GPa and tested up to 1 GPa. A bilateral comparison of both these new high-pressure standards took place in the laboratories of the CMI in November 2022. The original intended scope of the comparison was from 0.1 GPa up to 1 GPa but due to the leakage, piston fall-rate and sensitivity problems at the uppermost pressure point and the limited time for the measurements it was reduced to 0.9 GPa. The results of comparison were evaluated twofold – with a linear approximation for the Czech piston-cylinder and a quadratic one (a linear one for the SMU piston-cylinder in both cases). The results of both evaluations were satisfying but the quadratic approximation led to the values of the evaluation numbers to be lower by cca 20 % in average.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    O - Miscellaneous

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    20205 - Automation and control systems

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Others

  • Publication year

    2023

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů