All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F13%3A10125069" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/13:10125069 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10633-012-9359-5" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10633-012-9359-5</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9359-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10633-012-9359-5</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity

  • Original language description

    PURPOSE: To compare visual acuities estimated by three methods of visual evoked potential (VEP) recordings to those obtained by two subjective measures [ETDRS and FrACT (Freiburg acuity test)]. METHODS: Ten healthy subjects, aged between 26 and 67 years(mean 43.5), were examined. Best-corrected acuity determined by the ETDRS was between 0.03 and -0.3 logMAR (mean -0.06). Sweep VEPs (sweepVEP), pattern appearance VEPs (pappVEP) and steady-state VEPs (ssVEP) were recorded with two electrode placements (10-20 and Laplace) with best optical correction and with artificially degraded vision using five Bangerter occlusion foils, reducing acuity to about 0.1, 0.22, 0.52, 0.7 and 1.0 logMAR (0.8, 0.6, 0.3, 0.2 and 0.1 decimal scale). Two runs were performed. RESULTS: ETDRS and FrACT acuities showed good agreement, even though ETDRS seemed to underestimate acuity compared with FrACT at higher acuities. Laplace derivation did not improve any of the VEP-estimated acuities over the 10-20. SweepVEP

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>x</sub> - Unclassified - Peer-reviewed scientific article (Jimp, Jsc and Jost)

  • CEP classification

    FF - ENT (ie. ear, nose, throat), ophthalmology, dentistry

  • OECD FORD branch

Result continuities

  • Project

  • Continuities

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Others

  • Publication year

    2013

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Documenta Ophthalmologica

  • ISSN

    0012-4486

  • e-ISSN

  • Volume of the periodical

    126

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    1

  • Country of publishing house

    NL - THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

  • Number of pages

    12

  • Pages from-to

    45-56

  • UT code for WoS article

    000313518700005

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database