Medical device development process, and associated risks and legislative aspects-systematic review

Result code in IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F20%3A10414366" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/20:10414366 - isvavai.cz</a>

Alternative codes found

RIV/62690094:18450/20:50017009

Result on the web

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=GYQWmNKke-" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=GYQWmNKke-</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00308" target="_blank" >10.3389/fpubh.2020.00308</a>

Result language

angličtina

Original language name

Medical device development process, and associated risks and legislative aspects-systematic review

Original language description

Objective:Medical device development, from the product&apos;s conception to release to market, is very complex and relies significantly on the application of exact processes. This paper aims to provide an analysis and summary of current research in the field of medical device development methodologies, discuss its phases, and evaluate the associated legislative and risk aspects. Methods:The literature search was conducted to detect peer-reviewed studies in Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct, on content published between 2007 and November 2019. Based on exclusion and inclusion criteria, 13 papers were included in the first session and 11 were included in the second session. Thus, a total of 24 papers were analyzed. Most of the publications originated in the United States (7 out of 24). Results:The medical device development process comprises one to seven stages. Six studies also contain a model of the medical device development process for all stages or for just some of the stages. These studies specifically describe the concept stage during which all uncertainties, such as the clinical need definition, customer requirements/needs, finances, reimbursement strategy, team selection, and legal aspects, must be considered. Conclusion:The crucial factor in healthcare safety is the stability of factors over a long production time. Good manufacturing practices cannot be tested on individual batches of products; they must be inherently built into the manufacturing process. The key issues that must be addressed in the future are the consistency in the classification of devices throughout the EU and globally, and the transparency of approval processes.

Czech name

—

Czech description

—

Type

J_imp - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

CEP classification

—

OECD FORD branch

50201 - Economic Theory

Project

<a href="/en/project/GA17-03037S" target="_blank" >GA17-03037S: Investment evaluation of medical device development</a><br>

Continuities

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Publication year

2020

Confidentiality

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Name of the periodical

Frontiers in Public Health

ISSN

2296-2565

e-ISSN

—

Volume of the periodical

8

Issue of the periodical within the volume

JUL

Country of publishing house

CH - SWITZERLAND

Number of pages

13

Pages from-to

308

UT code for WoS article

000561559900001

EID of the result in the Scopus database

2-s2.0-85089422399