Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study
The result's identifiers
Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F24%3A10483409" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/24:10483409 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216224:14110/24:00136864 RIV/00216208:11110/24:10483409 RIV/00098892:_____/24:10158948 RIV/00064165:_____/24:10483409
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=6WGA-JJ-Vr" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=6WGA-JJ-Vr</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anae.16401" target="_blank" >10.1111/anae.16401</a>
Alternative languages
Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study
Original language description
Background: The i-gel(R) Plus is a modified version of the i-gel(R) supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice. Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported. Results: In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients. Conclusions: The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—
Classification
Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30223 - Anaesthesiology
Result continuities
Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Others
Publication year
2024
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Data specific for result type
Name of the periodical
Anaesthesia
ISSN
0003-2409
e-ISSN
1365-2044
Volume of the periodical
79
Issue of the periodical within the volume
12
Country of publishing house
GB - UNITED KINGDOM
Number of pages
8
Pages from-to
1284-1291
UT code for WoS article
001285421200001
EID of the result in the Scopus database
2-s2.0-85200987386