Reply to Irimie et al

Result code in IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F25%3A10503981" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/25:10503981 - isvavai.cz</a>
Alternative codes found
RIV/00216208:11150/25:10503981
Result on the web
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=YwCB8DfP0G" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=YwCB8DfP0G</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf325" target="_blank" >10.1093/ejcts/ezaf325</a>

Result language
angličtina
Original language name
Reply to Irimie et al
Original language description
Reply to Irimie et al. is a short response to a Letter to Editor written by Imirie et al. which discussed possible alternatives to the surgical techniques presented in our original article ("Aortic valve performance after remodelling versus reimplantation in a propensity-matched comparison"). Although the techniques presented by our group are generally accepted and well established, Imirie et al. proposed a controversial alternative, i.e. cusp augmentation and omitting the annuloplasty. Long-term outcomes of this technique are limited to single-centre experience. In Reply to Irimie we discuss the evidence and controversies associated with this technique, while documenting our own outcomes, etiology and treatment of complications met during aortic valve repair.
Czech name
—
Czech description
—

Type
J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database
CEP classification
—
OECD FORD branch
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Project
—
Continuities
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Publication year
2025
Confidentiality
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Similar results(10)